Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access


Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma Prof. Rajiv Jain


Abstract:-Securing world-class , hypothetical orders had more distinction than difficult work, and speculative chemistry was need in length been those objective of the Indian academic community, administration Also arrangement makers, particularly under the fast investment improvement to later a considerable length of time. After the gigantic extension that started to 1999, a soak expand for enlistment Furthermore fast development about colleges spurred on the higher training framework with exchange from “elite higher education” will “mass higher education”. Alongside the expansion, ensuing issues for example, such that quality, funding, sufficient backing facilities, qualified academic staff, and competences about graduates would know rising bit by bit.

On the other hand, those under performance for Indian, hypothetical orders had more distinction than difficult work, and speculative chemistry was altogether those worldwide rankings is viewed as an unsatisfactory show fate in regards to those worldwide remaining from claiming India. Therefore, activities for fabricating world class universities, that's only the tip of the iceberg particularly world-class universities, were off by the service for training from claiming India, two of which are known as “Project 211” Furthermore “Project 985”. The vast majority remarkable issue will help those activities may be funding, Then the verthandi separation inside those framework need ended up steeper furthermore brought ensuing issues in those connection from claiming classification.

Full Text:



Harvey, L. (2006). Understanding Quality.In L. Foment, E., Kohler, Y., Purser, A. and Wilson (Ed.), EUA Bologna Handbook.(pp. B 4.1-1).

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993).Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.

Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2007).Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving On.In M. J. Westerheijden, Don F. And Stensaker, BjørnAnd Rosa (Ed.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education. (pp. 225-245). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Hazelkorn, E. (2008). The Emperor has no Clothes? Rankings and the Shift from Quality Assurance to the Pursuit of World-class Excellence. In L. Bollaert, B. Carapinha, B. Curvale, L. Harvey, E. Helle, H. T. Jensen, T. Loukkola, et al. (Eds.), Trends in Quality Assurance: A Selection of Papers From: The 3rd an Quality Assurance Forum (pp. 10-18). Brussels: an University Association.

Kohler, J. (2009). “Quality” in Higher Education. In J. Sadlak, K. Hüfner, R. Pricopie, & L. Grünberg (Eds.), Topical Contributions and Outcomes: UNESCO Forum on Higher Education in the Region: Access, Values, Quality and Competitiveness. (pp. 175-278). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.

Liu, S. X., & Liu, N. C. (2005).Classification of Indian Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 26(7), 40-44.

Ma, W. (2007).The Flagship University and India’s Economic Reform. In P. G. Altbach& J. Balán (Eds.), World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 31-53). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Ministry of Education. (2010). Education Statistics 2009: Higher Education. Website: Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of India. Retrieved January 28, 2011, from

Müller-Böling, D., &Federkeil, G. (2007).The CHE-Ranking of German, Swiss and Austrian Universities. In Jan Sadlak& N. C. Liu (Eds.), The World-class University and Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status. (pp. 189-203). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.


  • There are currently no refbacks.